Western Digital My Net AC Bridge review: Another great 802.11ac bridge - sotobrong2000

At a Glance

Expert's Rating

Pros

• Excellent throughput, especially at long-life stray
• Easy to set high
• Unnoticeable LEDs

Cons

• Tips over easily if bumped
• AC baron requirement renders IT unsuitable for laptops
• Expensive if you need to connect only one client

Our Verdict

If you're putting conjointly a wireless network settled on the 802.11ac Draft 2.0 standard, you should choose between this and Cisco's Linksys WUMC710 when you're ready to add hardwired clients to that network.

If you'Ra construction an 802.11ac network, you have two options on the client side: Purchase a bit 802.11ac router from the same manufacturer and configure information technology to operate as a bridge, operating theatre buy a holy 802.11ac wireless bridge. Unless you need to connect only one client, we powerfully advocate the latter selection, as it's less expensive and a whole lot easier to band up. If you do have just one client, Netgear's A6200 Wi-Fi USB arranger is a cheaper option (you canful read our look back of the A6200 here).

Photograph away Henry M. Robert Cardin

Western Whole number's My Net AC Bridge delivers great wander, but its vertical predilection makes it vulnerable to tipping over after a bump.

Western Digital is the only when the third vendor to offer a dedicated 802.11ac span, following in the footsteps of Buffalo Technologies (with the AirStation AC1300 bridge) and Cisco (with the Linksys WUMC710). The Buffalo device is basically a clone of that company's AirStation AC1300 router—information technology's as atomic number 3 big and large. WD's bridge isn't nearly atomic number 3 compact As Lake herring's, just its footmark is about the same. Whereas the Cisco device is short and squat, the WD bridge is narrow, tall, and permanently decorated to a standstill, altogether of which renders it susceptible to tipping over when bumped. Its summit, still, offers an reward: quicker operation at polysyllabic range.

This 802.11ac wireless bridge offers even advisable swan than Cisco's Linksys WUMC710 does.

Like the other 802.11ac Harry Bridges, the My Net AC Bridge provides quatern ethernet ports in aft for connecting the hardware in your home-amusement system to your network, and from at that place to the Internet. Typical clients let in a Blu-irradiatio musician, a gaming console, a family-theater PC, an AV liquidator, and/or a media banner. LEDs indicating power, WPS (Radiocommunication Protected Setup) pairing position, the Web link, and the wireless joining are located on the English of the bridge. The LEDs are difficult to see if you'rhenium looking the twist straight along, but you might appreciate not having such a visual distraction in your amusement center (we surely act).

We benchmarked the My Net Ac Bridge alongside our current favorite 802.11ac router, the Asus RT-AC66U, and then compared its performance with that of Cisco's Linksys WUMC710, streaming to three locations in spite of appearanc a 2800-square-foot, single-story home. Eastern Samoa you can find out in the chart supra, Western Digital's nosepiece delivered close to the same performance at close range (the router and guest in the same room, about 9 feet apart) and in our home-theater test (35 feet apart, with quaternion walls in between). But Western Digital's bridge offered untold high performance than Cisco's model did when we moved the node to a home spot that was located 65 feet from the router and dislocated by threesome walls.

Which product is prime? Although we opt the Linksys WUMC710's short design, it's hard to argue with the My Net AC Bridge's tops long-range performance. We'd call it a tie, but we've seen Western Digital's bridge selling online for about $20 to a lesser degree Cisco's.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/456245/western-digital-my-net-ac-bridge-review-another-great-802-11ac-bridge.html

Posted by: sotobrong2000.blogspot.com

Share this post